Wednesday, October 30, 2013

Truth is a Tree: A Halloween Tale of Pumpkins, Irrational Rituals, and Other ‘Enemies of Reason’



Truth is a Tree: A Halloween Tale of Pumpkins, Irrational Rituals, and Other ‘Enemies of Reason’
Neela Bhattacharya Saxena 



Round, orange, juicy and seedy pumpkins with empty innards have been adorning the stores and doors of the American people as a lazy October is fast approaching its end.  Scary masks are bought and sold in the market place; sugary candy hoarded.  Zombies are selling insurance and spooky movies are in. At the other end of our planet, India is whirling toward Diwali, the festival of light; in Bengal, my part of the country, final touches are being put on clay Kali murtis for the worship of the fiercest form of the Great Mother, the presiding deity of the Tantras, and for many, a mark of India’s refusal to give up its primitive religiosities.  

At home in suburban America, I watch leaves in many shades of orange, brown and red fall, and maple seeds scatter in our yard. I contemplate the entangled nature of death and regeneration with my esteemed anthropologist friend Frederique Apffel-Marglin who speaks of ‘subversive spiritualities. I then learn that Richard Dawkins, the resident rationalist in the world of culture wars, has just declared that Barack Obama must be an atheist. To this black and white fight between patriarchal monotheists and reactionary atheists, I offer a colorful polytheistic and non-theistic point of view that has no quarrel with science as a rational inquiry into reality. This is to show respect for the environmental activist Satish Kumar, one of the alleged ‘enemies of reason’ and a ‘slave of superstition’ (see interview below) according to a British TV documentary created by Dawkins a few years ago. 

Friedrich Nietzsche who had famously declared that God is dead had also mused whether truth was a woman. He did ruffle more than a few feathers before sinking into insanity; a supreme thinker lost in the depth of his psyche as the western world began to come to terms with its bloody religious and imperial history and produced its special brand of scientific atheism.  Nietzsche also wanted to believe in dancing gods.  At these spooky times as I dance with Kali and wish a thoroughly haunted and enjoyable Halloween to all, I wonder if truth is a tree! 

Not too many of us may know that the word true in the English language is derived from the same root as the word tree!  N J Girardot says the Old English word ‘treowe’, ‘trywe’ meaning “firmly planted like a tree” is what we take to be “true.”  In the world of old religions, harvest times are celebratory times; it is especially true of autumn, a liminal time before the dark half of the year begins.  In some parts of India Sharad Purnima or fall Full Moon night is celebrated as Kojagari Lakshmi puja when Shasya Lakshmi or the grain goddess is worshipped.  During the coming New Moon and Diwali night Dhanalakshmi or the goddess of prosperity will be worshipped in most of India.  Truth could very well be a woman and a tree, among other names and forms of an ineffable reality, for many Hindus. 

Back to Halloween.  As a Lunar Indian and a Kali lover, I find the roots of this festival fascinating.  All Hallow’s Eve may be rooted in a Celtic harvest festival, Gaelic Samhain and has affinities with the feast of Pomona, Roman goddess of fruits and seeds. It was Christianized like many other ‘pagan’ rituals; Mexican Day of the Dead is no exception to this which can be traced to a pre-Columbian past.  Not surprisingly, it is connected to Mictecacihuatl, an Aztec goddess of the underworld.  Apparently Halloween masks are worn to hide from the souls since at this Dark Moon night the line between the outer and inner, sanity and insanity, life and death is rather thin.  Depth psychologists like M. Esther Harding, a Jungian therapist, would have cool stuff to say about this. 

The broom flying Halloween witches are distorted reminders of a pre-Christian Europe whose medicine women and Wiccan priestesses were burnt at the stakes exactly when a reductive ‘rationalism’ was taking over the continent.  This is the time when Cartesian dualism, what is now known as Descartes’ Error, thanks to scientists like Antonio Damasio, was radically separating the mind and the body leading to some of the worst excesses of racism, sexism and rationalizations of colonialism, not to speak of the abysmal objectification of all nature. 

Leaving this unpalatable history, I now invite you to the womblike emptiness of the pumpkins and gourds, a metaphor for the Mother Goddesses’ creative expression in the world.  We turn to China and to eastern India’s Baul singers.  Tantric sage Khepababa’s Ektara or one stringed instrument made of a gourd, a Bengali lau (Hindi lauki), sings of the emptiness of empty Prajna Paramita, the Buddhist goddess of wisdom. I describe my Kali as ‘pregnant nothingness’. It was no surprise to discover that the Great Mother of Chinese Daoism is a dark female.  Girardot in his Myth and Meaning in Early Daoism asserts the truth of the gourd mother. He says that the gourd is ‘botanically a womb.’ Who would have thought that the orange pumpkins on American doors are strangely connected to a Chinese autumn festival when round lanterns are lit and ‘gourds hung from the rafters.’

In the 21st century we communicate via the World Wide Web of interconnectedness, an astonishing accomplishment of modern science, and yet live in a precarious world where national borders cannot save us from ecological disasters.  Today such connections can be reminders that we are embedded creatures in nature and with each other, and not separate entities in water tight rational compartments. In spite of all the sanitizing efforts of ‘rational religions’ and ‘scientific atheism’ people still seem to revel in 'irrational' rituals, and consciously or unconsciously recognize the divinity of woman, nature, and what is beyond simple ratiocination.  

Dawkins may need his crusade to save science from fundamentalists who deny evolution and literalize their own religious myths.  I also prefer an honest atheist who does not need a deity’s prohibition to act ethically in the world over superstitious charlatans and fear and hate mongering fanatics of any religion.  However, seeing two Indians on the list of ‘enemies of reason’ I could not help but remember British colonial days of ‘civilizing’ and proselytizing missions.  While Deepak Chopra, the super star celebrity, the other ‘enemy of reason’, has a brand to sell like Dawkins, and needs no mention here, the lesser known Satish Kumar should be heard in full.  I leave it to the readers and the watchers to decide if the man who made a peace march from India to England and beyond is a ‘slave of superstition’, or like our inscrutable President Obama who has also been called a Zen master, something too slippery to be put in any easy box. 

Halloween as a ‘holy’ evening is perhaps about wholeness and interconnectivity between life and death, a secret that poets and mystics of the world have always known.  Robert Frost once wrote, “We dance round in a ring and suppose,/But the Secret sits in the middle and knows.” Looking at the denuding trees and dying plants in our yard, I know naked truth can be hard to handle, but regeneration depends on degeneration.  I end with my hats off to another British scientist, psychiatrist Iain McGilchrist whose The Master and His Emissary: The Divided Brain and the Making of the Western World is a stark reminder of the dangers of truncated certainties; he speaks of the in between and the relational where the supreme reason of our full humanity and not just instrumental rationality of the left brain, resides.   

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=19Sqt-zqmrk

Thursday, October 10, 2013

Nature, Woman, Wisdom: Uma, Daughter of the Mountain Speaks

India is a teller of tales with multiple layers of meaning.It recognized multiplicity of expression of an inexpressible reality rather early; hence, it imagined polycentric and polytheistic ways even when it recognized a nondual unity.  Among the many tales this ancient land tells, here is one from Kena Upanishad: Once upon a time, three male Vedic gods, Agni- god of fire, Vayu god of air, and Indra-god of thunder, were boasting about their powers.  A form appeared and put a blade of grass in front of them.  Agni could not burn it; Vayu could not blow it.  When Indra went to investigate, it disappeared.  Questing in the sky, he came across a beautiful woman, Uma Haimavati, the daughter of the Himalayas. He asked her who was that vanished spirit? 

Uma said to Indra: this is Brahman, the ultimate reality, thus introducing them to “real-ization” beyond theory.  This Uma is also Parvati or Shakti, the mildest form of the Great Goddess, who has to take her fierce Durga/Kali form to teach us what cannot be known through the head, intellect, or theorizing books.  At this auspicious time of Navaratri when Indiais joyfully preparing for the arrival of Durga, the invincible symbol of feminine force, even as the world continues in its violent ways, I offer this reflection on Nature/Prakriti, Woman/Nari, and Wisdom/Prajna.

Since my mother follows our traditional ways, I have become more aware of the lunar calendar and its connection with women’s quiet and joyful spirituality. With her I celebrated the last full moon day when the time of the Fathers (pitri paksha) began; at this time Hindus pay tribute to all the ancestors. The time of the Mothers will come after this fortnight when India will sing the mantra of the Mother.  So first, I fondly remember my departed Kali devotee father and all the fathers that instill in their daughters dignity and self-respect so that they may recognize the liberatory power of Shakti in the depth of their being. 

To continue my dialogue in this forum, let’s first take stock of the times.  Another shooting has taken place in the US, one more in Kenya, Syrians continue to die, and the Delhi rapists have been condemned to death.  Talking heads here continue to chatter whether it is the gun that kills, or the man holding the gun.  I won’t go there, but as an English professor enjoying her sabbatical, I can’t help remembering Chaucer’s“Wife of Bath” in the context of punishment for rape. In her tale, the Wife of Bath or Alyson narrates an Arthurian Knight’s rape trial who was condemned to death by the King.  The Queen intervenes and gives him a year to save himself if he can find out what women want! Sounds familiar?

If you Google this tale, you will find out that the exhausted knight after a year’s efforts was saved by an old hag who taught him a lesson about women’s need for sovereignty over their bodies.  The knight learns his lesson and lives happily ever after with the hag who magically turns into a beautiful woman.  In this tale as well as in real life people often ignore the woman who was raped.  This story captures a time when women’s sovereignty from the Avalon days were slowly taken away by patriarchal Christianity.  Chaucer was relentless in pointing out the misery caused by corrupt clerics of his times.  Today stories like the Mists of Avalon and other Arthurian Grail legends dimly imagine another possible time and another possible relationship between men and women. 

In the Indian scene where cyclical rather than linear notions of time pervade, there are more than enough hints of other ways of being if the innumerable stories reflect at least some facts about real life. It is a greater pity that in the only country where the Mother Principle could not be erased, crimes against women and girls define its current global identity. I am glad that an abysmally slow Indian “justice” system fast tracked the Delhi rape trial and came up with a verdict that might satisfy some people for the time being.  Reported or unreported, rapes in the meantime continue all over the world, and if evolutionary psychologists like Steven Pinker are right, it is not going anywhere any time soon.  

Although I am against the death penalty in principle, I do not really care what happens to these men. Such a penalty does have a role to play in satisfying vengeance and create some semblance of fear of the law. I must point out that their brutality was a symptom of male delusion that they actually are the owners of female bodies.  Like the male gods who thought in the above mentioned Upanishad that they actually have power over natural elements, men and women both need to know the role “woman” plays in helping us recognize who or what we really are. 

In India where we worship trees, rivers, animals and half animal half human gods, most people do not have any problem acknowledging our evolutionary and genetically determined animal past.  Nature as a whole can teach us a lot about how to be human if we drop our arrogant dualistic assumption that our minds are superior to our bodies. It is interesting that many cultures connect nature and women in both good and bad ways. While our Aghori Baba reminds us that both men and women have to deal with their “prakriti”or small nature, it is not an accident that Cosmic Nature, the primal teacher,too is understood as female.  Even patriarchal monotheism that does not generally accord divinity to anything female invokes Mother Nature when a powerful storm shakes its arrogant confidence in controlling her.

Women and men as creatures, or jiva, are very similar as human beings but also different in joyful ways. However, there is a reason why women are seen as closer to wisdom bestowing Nature; their menstruating and potentially birthing bodies hide an inscrutable secret knowledge that no uninitiated “man”has access to.  Ordinary woman (nari) too must awaken that energy - that awe and joy inspiring Shakti.  Uma Haimavati, Parvati, daughter of the Mountain teaches that knowledge that makes us break into dance and song at the sheer wonder that is life.

Traditional India’s magnificent flowering as a civilization of sophisticated learning and amazing aesthetic expression in temple art, music,literature, and dance was based on its paradoxical recognition that Kama(pleasure) and Moksha (freedom) belong to the woman.  Hence when attempting a division of labor, it put desire/kama and freedom/moksha/nirvana in the world of women and dharma(righteous action) and artha (money and prestige) in the area of men.  Today, tired of excesses of patriarchy, women all over the world have entered the external Yang world of money and power, but most men are not taught their deeply freeing inner Yin qualities.

Yogic and tantric paths train both men and women to submit to the Mother Principle because without her, inner freedom is not possible. Ancient India like many old cultures understood that Prakriti is Pradhana or primary. That core is reflected in the nondual Tantras, the practical path of self-realization. It is curious the role the prefix ‘pra’ has played since the Sankhya times when Pradhana/Prakriti was ‘theorized’. Sanskrit words like prakriti (nature), prajna (wisdom), pratyaksha (actualized knowledge), pran (life force/breath), pranam (surrendering protestation) and prem (sweet conjugal love)are all connected through this prefix. Not to forget the English word “practice.”

The word jnana which is etymologically connected to the word knowledge is usually associated with more androcentric, head heavy, and concept driven ideas.  When we add the prefix pra, we are at the very heart of Prajna Paramita and Mula Prakriti (Primordial Nature). She helps us unite the Yin and Yang aspects of our being and gets us out of the world-denying,heaven-inhabiting gods whose theories mesmerize us. Khepababa, KulavadhutaSatpurananda very kindly explained to me the root connection between theories (Greek theoria) and Theos and the importance of Theos (various theistic gods in India)in primarily non-theistic traditions of India. Theorizing is important, or we lose our extraordinary human intellect and our ability to truly understand and change our ways; however, to be stuck in theory is like knowing all about musical notes but never hearing a song.

While I have no easy solutions to the problem of violence, I take heart in Steven Pinker’s latest hopeful book, The Better Angels of our Nature: Why violence has Declined.  One of the reasons he gives is what he calls “feminization”and the rise of women’s rights world over. He cites Tsutomu Yamaguchi, the only Japanese man who managed to escape both atomic bombs.  Yamaguchi said before his natural death: “The only people who should be allowed to govern countries with nuclear weapons are mothers, those who are still breast-feeding their babies” (684).  Referring to Margaret Thatcher, Pinker reminds us women operating within and benefiting from oppressive patriarchal systems are not an answer.  Putting the burden on women to reduce world-wide violence is also not fair, but encouraging what Pinker calls “female-friendly values” mainly “because of the psychological legacy of the basic biological differences between the sexes” is something worth theorizing about.

A young student friend Sarika Persaud who is studying psychotherapy and spirituality pointed out to me how rejection of prakriti in spiritual life in some interpretations of Indian texts lead to subduing prakriti or "feminine" side of our own psychology.  This leads to all kinds of disorders in both men and women.   If we combine east and west, north and south in developing a truly global awareness and learn from ancient knowledge systems along with 21st century science to forge our policies, we may contribute toward that reduction of violence.  I talk of the dharma paths of India that are a repository of extraordinary Gynocentric paths because that is my cultural and genetic inheritance.  I dedicate this to the next generation that includes my two sons who help me think and fill me with joy.  May the Great Mother in her myriad forms give our intellect the right orientation.

"No Country for Women": A Tantric Interlude by Neela Bhattacharya Saxena

August 31, 2013 at 10:09pm



It is curious that as some people waited for the world to end, regenerate, or recycle itself into a new Yuga at the end of 2012, small worlds did end in two countries I have known rather intimately.  On December 14, child sacrifices were offered at the altar of the 2nd amendment in the US. At the southern end of the globe, two days later a young woman was brutally sacrificed at the altar of male sexual violence in New Delhi.  Neither event was particularly exceptional. Gun violence is accepted as a norm in the US; horror stories about rapes in India emblazon the news headlines.  I can’t even begin to mention war ravaged other parts of the world. And yet, and yet! Did the exceptionally gruesome nature of those events in the age of the Internet shake the complacency of the average human being? 

Switch to Mumbai 2013: “No country for Women?” cries the India Abroad headline, and women tourists shun the ancient land adding to the rupee’s ominous downward slide; however, the latest reported rape case inaugurates something new. This woman in a Mumbai hospital refuses to be a victim and says what most people are not used to hearing; “rape is not the end of life”!  The shame associated with a “defiled body” scares women no less than the danger associated with rape. As a Shakti worshipper who has been watching the awakening of the woman’s compassionate power along with a curious return of an often maligned ancient path of Tantra, I want to present a short Tantric interlude via a Bengali book called Tantrabhilasheer Shadhu Shanga (In the Company of Tantric Sadhus).  The writer Pramod Kumar Chattopadhyaya (1885-1979), a brahmin interlocutor who assumes female inferiority, records in this rare book, among other things, his conversations with two Tantra sadhakas, Aghori Baba and Bhairavi Maheshwari Ma.   
  
Pramod Kumar asks Aghori Baba about the attraction between men and women using the standard Sanskrit/Bengali/Hindi words, nari for woman and purusha for man.  Aghori Baba swiftly interrupts, “I will hear other stuff later; first you have to fix a mistake.  You said nari and purusha but that ought to be nari prakriti and purusha prakriti, you must say nari (ordinary woman) and nar (ordinary man).”  Pramod protested: “Oh that is just your semantic excess!”  Aghori roared: “ফের শালা তুই না বুঝে পনডিতি করছিস Hey idiot, you are trying your intellectualism without knowing anything.  In this grand universe of Prakriti, is there even one Purusha?  The one you are calling purusha, he is a mere creature of Prakriti.  Having a big linga does not make one Purusha! The qualities of Purusha exist as much in woman.”
  
Here is the crux of Aghori Baba’s indignation.  Patriarchal systems convince even some women in India that the mere male of the species is somehow spiritually superior because she is nothing but a body.  It is at least somewhat connected with the mixing up of terminology.  The word Purusha has deep connotations of a cosmic being, a realized being, a Shiva, a Buddha, a witness in “his” splendid isolation who scoffs at the dance of Prakriti or Nature, often gendered as female.  Nothing new in the world of your usual religions! But Tantra turns this into its head by seeing the Adyashakti Mahamaya, the Great Mother Principle, the root of all, in Mula Prakriti. 

Later when our Pramod Kumar hesitatingly talks to the Bhairavi, Maheswari Ma, she points out how all the nonsense in Brahminic India about women and their bodies have created “bhrashtachar” or immoral behavior in society.  She explicates the most astounding Shaiva path of union between women and men in total equality without any caste barrier. Trying to defend Brahminic control of the woman, Pramod timidly asks about women’s “shatittva” or the so called purity of her body: “In Tantra since married men and women are allowed to separate, won’t that destroy the woman’s life?” Ma thunders: “Why? She can start her life with another as does the man”!

Our 22 year Mumbai woman who is eager to return to work must have known her indwelling Mahashakti, and she has nothing to fear.  India’s problem is a global problem; it starkly reveals the diseased ideologies, the nadir of whatever has been going on for a long time in human history ,abysmal degradation of whatever is called woman, body, matter, sexuality under interlocking oppressive systems that are out to destroy the very planet because we think we are the masters of Prakriti.

Maheswari Ma points out how power hungry Brahminic orthodoxies have distorted Tantra in India.  This has made India impotent as it lost its Shakta mooring, the very birthright of all human beings.  Tantra that belongs to no narrow religion, teaches how to live life and recognize its breathtaking beauty; Ma says, traditionally it made no distinction between grihasthi (householder) and sanyasi – (wandering yogi).  Excessive emphasis on world/woman denying religions especially a misreading of the word Maya in India (world as illusion) has partially led to our troubles. Yet  because the Mother Principle could not be suppressed in old India by any power structures, there remains the traces of an ancient path of sanity, beauty, and strength that is not about domination but recognizing one’s deepest potential. 

In today’s world a Tantric teacher Khepababa, Kulavadhuta Satpurananda, clarifies a misunderstood philosophy that is the substratum of Tantra: “According to Sankhya Sutra the realizers or Purusha are many but the realized is one Prakriti. This is why innumerable prophets, avataras, Budhhas and Bodhisattvas have realized the same Truth through veracity of Realization. Each one is unique and reflecting the same Truth in the teachings through various views and thus various ways or means discovered as various medicines for curing various diseases.”

May we then dare imagine women’s “purushartha” in the 21st century and attempt to cure today’s societal diseases? May we teach the Shakta path to women without any agonistic relationship with the average male of the species? I have tried to unearth this Gynocentric Matrix in my work because as a Kali worshipper I know that  true Tantric dhyan awakens Prajna, the deep feminine wisdom and helps us recognize our birth right (Sahaja), our true potential as a human being who is spontaneously attuned to the cosmic dance.